taylor.town about now spam rss

Kimba Syndrome

This essay is part of a series on offensive horticulture.

The first time Disney stole a lion (by accident), it stole the whole Lion King. This documentary makes a solid case that the Lion King directors were unaware of Kimba, but it's still a fun conspiracy theory.

The second time Disney stole a lion (by accident), it stole the lion from Solomon Linda. In 1939, Linda improvised The Lion Sleeps Tonight in sub-saharan Africa's only recording studio. RCA executives colluded with Gallo to obfuscate the origins of the song; Linda died penniless. Of course there's a documentary on this too.

Songs are frequently stolen in the music industry. Labels wield asymmetric information against publishers/studios, who wield asymmetric information against musicians. It's a chain of middlemen, where everybody is incentivized to misinform sellers and collude with buyers.

Exploitation abounds wherever the following is true:

Multinationals employ scientists to scour the world for nifty chemicals to sell. But sometimes indigenous peoples aren't fairly attributed/compensated for their roles in scientific discoveries and related profits.

Rosy Periwinkle Madagascar’s gem, has been a significant source for cancer drugs, profiting Big Pharma while the locals who cultivated it saw no financial benefit
Neem Tree treasured in India for its medicinal properties, was patented by W.R. Grace, leading to prolonged legal battles over biopiracy
Turmeric known for its ancient medicinal use in India, was controversially patented in the US, only for the patent to be revoked after significant protest
Ayahuasca a sacred brew of Amazonian tribes, was granted a US patent, which was later canceled following an outcry over the appropriation of indigenous knowledge
Enola Bean a staple food in Mexico, was patented by a US citizen, but Mexico eventually won the legal fight to protect its agricultural heritage
Hoodia a plant from the Kalahari Desert used as an appetite suppressant, saw the San tribes exploited when commercial interests took over its use
Quinoa an Andean superfood, experienced a surge in Western demand, which in turn caused local prices to soar, making it less accessible to the native populations who cultivated it
Teff a grain from Ethiopia, was patented by a Dutch company, leading to backlash and debates over the ethics of patenting traditional crops
Thermus aquaticus a bacterium producing the enzyme Taq used in DNA replication, was commercialized without any financial benefit to the park where it was discovered
Rooibos a South African herbal tea, faced a patent claim in Japan that was later revoked after challenges over the rights to traditional knowledge
Basmati Rice a long-grain rice from India and Pakistan, faced controversy when a US company attempted to patent a strain, leading to international disputes over intellectual property
Kava a ceremonial drink in Pacific Island cultures, saw increased commercial interest and attempts to patent its use, raising concerns over the exploitation of indigenous practices
Lapacho a tree with medicinal bark used by indigenous South Americans, became the subject of patents by foreign companies, leading to debates on biopiracy
Açaí a berry from the Amazon rainforest, gained global popularity for its health benefits, prompting patent claims and concerns over fair trade and benefit-sharing with local communities
Sacha Inchi an oil-rich seed from the Amazon, saw foreign patenting efforts, sparking debates on the protection of indigenous agricultural knowledge and practices
Manuka Honey from New Zealand, faced trademark battles over the use of the name and origin, highlighting issues of geographical indication and biopiracy
Maca a root crop from the Andes known for its medicinal properties, encountered patent claims by foreign companies, causing disputes over traditional knowledge and bioprospecting
Yacon an Andean root vegetable prized for its health benefits, was subject to international patent claims, raising concerns over biopiracy and benefit-sharing
Kiwifruit originally from China, was commercialized and patented in New Zealand, leading to discussions on the fair distribution of profits derived from genetic resources
Cupuaçu an Amazonian fruit, faced patenting attempts by foreign entities, resulting in legal challenges and calls for the protection of indigenous resources and knowledge

Pardon me -- the table was generated by GPT-4o.

Of course we want to reward scientific exploration. Of course we want to share the bounties of technological progress with humanity. And while we do all that, we should respect the wants/needs of peoples in those supply chains and fairly share spoils.

There is no prescriptive solution here. How do we "share spoils" with a culture that rejects personal property? Should we publish discoveries about secret/sacred traditions?

Sure, maybe all this is legal; maybe it's also super shitty. There will always be more ways to be shitty than jurisprudence can formalize. Don't be an asshole, please.

The simplest inoculation for assholes is an enema called transparency. Publish research. Incentivize kindness. Flatten hirearchies. Maintain records. Simplify agreements. Murder middlemen. And so on.

Sorry for the sermon, folks -- just stop stealing lions, okay? Maybe I should lay off the peace pipe --